Why the Investigation Drags On

An open letter to TopG. Do your attorneys in Romania understand why the US needs to have the Romanian prosecutor keep you locked up and silent?

When you were arrested, you seemed surprised that you were even being investigated. Most likely, the Romanians have been paid to keep a plan ON HOLD to arrest and imprison you for the full 180-days permitted for an “investigation.” An investigation on anything even slightly plausible. Or an investigation on nothing at all.

Right now, the US is worried that you are aware of the following information. The last thing they need is for you, the world’s best communicator, to explain the material below to your followers, who include many millions of young Internet users.

Yes, I believe that the Romanians were told to be ready to arrest you on a minute’s notice in case there was a sudden need to insure your complete SILENCE. The shit hit the fan when the US Supreme Court put an Internet case on its docket.

Some of the items below may be material that you haven’t seen yourself yet. Your team needs to understand the items in the list below AND connect the dots.

• There is a case coming before the US Supreme Court in the next few months. It is called Reynaldo Gonzalez, et. al. v. Google LLC.
• It may force the US Congress to act on one of a number of proposed bills that would affect Section 230 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. There is bipartisan legislation pending in the US Congress right now in favor of breaking up Big Tech, on the grounds that it is acting as a monopoly (which it did in banishing Andrew Tate).
• As Section 230 stands right now, print publishers are legally responsible for what they bring to the public eye, so if you are damaged in print, you can sue; Internet platforms aren’t “responsible.”
• Section 230 is the reason Big Tech can easily censor and downplatform content providers: nobody can sue them, and advertisers and other parties love them.
• Section 230 also permitted the cozy relationships between the FBI and other politicized departments of the US government, which permitted Google and other platforms, as evidenced in the Twitter Files, to tilt elections and to shut up dissenting voices (such as Andrew Tate). Remember, other than Donald Trump, Andrew Tate is the only individual to survive a Big Tech banishment.
• See the Twitter Files for details on how government departments influence social media, telling them what and who to shadow ban or censor outright, all under the guise of “national security.”
• Glenn Greenwald, on a Rumble livestream on January 23, 2023 (“Big Tech Protects the Security State”), covered all the basic information, but you will not read very much about the court case until opening arguments in a few months, because just how much change it could bring about is uncertain.

God bless and protect you, Andrew.