Information about the Tate brothers’ case is hard to find. In the first few weeks after the arrests, I used to think that I just wasn’t finding the best Web sites. It seemed to be mere luck if I stumbled over court dates, names of attorneys or parties involved, and the information I found could disappear overnight. Things have only gotten worse throughout 2023.
Disappearing “victims.” There are so many things that simply NEVER were explained. WHO THE HELL WERE “THE SIX VICTIMS? I don’t think I could ever account for more than four, and I wasn’t sure the four I tallied were actually all included in the putative “six victims.” And then the law professor who was once part of the Tate legal team stated emphatically that there WERE ONLY FOUR. Ah, progress! But then he identified these women by nationality, and I couldn’t account for “the Moldovan woman.” Someone explained to me that some Moldovans are also Romanians, so perhaps the missing bitch was a misfile. Then, the video of the professor disappeared, and I just scrapped that post.
Disappearing commentary. Sorin Ovidiu Balan, an investigative journalist, appeared as part of a panel on a Romanian television broadcast in early February. He commented, “We are scratching our heads trying to figure out why we arrested the Tate brothers,” and elaborated in another segment of the broadcast: “One hundred percent it’s interference. And I can vouch that this interference does not come from our homeland. I mean, we are simply executing the order we received to arrest them.”
Tristan limits the number of bad guys. The video of this panel discussion is, of course, no longer available, but I thought of it a few months back when Tristan tweeted that there were a limited number of people involved in bringing the case against him and his brother. He gave a specific number (four? six?), and I stupidly thought Tate followers would want to try to identify these individuals. However, although I suggested this in a dozen or so comment sections on YouTube and Rumble, I couldn’t interest anyone in trying to solve the puzzle.
I felt that two were obvious: the leak-loving prosecutor and the police commander who conducted the December raid on the Tate villa. I had seen a report that the commander was officially reprimanded over the raid because his superiors learned about learned of it only when they saw it on television. The raid video looked like an expensively produced documentary, something designed to immortalize a great moment in the history of Romanian justice. (See my early view on what was taking place in my fictional account of the Matrix in action against the Tate Four.) I also thought one of the the limited number of bad actors may have been the female judge who showed up twice to keep the Tates locked up with the roaches. She was supposedly an “at random” selection from at least a dozen options.
Nicola Nicolai, a former Romanian prosecutor who commented on the Tate case, (see Nicolai’s Clue on Tate), speculated that there was outside intervention in the case. I felt as though I was the only person who noticed her. Frank Valchiria, who posted the video, had to give up uploading any video about the case. He relies on his YouTube account for income, and he was relentlessly shadowbanned once he posted material that suggested Tate might not be the predator the MSM was describing.
I would love to hear from any reader who has any insight into anything I have mentioned above. I’m not hard to reach. You can DM me on X (@cyclonejane47) or send me an email through the contact page on this blog. In fact, if you do that AND sign-up for a WordPress account (it’s free), I’d be willing to set up a password-protected private post where we could correspond. I’m always happy to talk about Tate material.
Cyclonejane
December 14, 2023
Conundrum Andrew Tate 